Having finished the examination of temporal theory at The Examiner, I turn my attention to a subject I’ve addressed before, Star Trek. I have drafted a five-part discussion which begins today with Star Trek: Introduction to the 2009 Movie.
Although I’ve got a stack of articles which are answers to questions, I’m thinking that I probably need to focus on analyzing another movie–I just have not yet decided which one. Lake House has the advantages that I have viewed it, it’s relatively simple even if temporally disastrous, and Sandra Bullock and Keanu Reeves are high profile names; it has the disadvantages that there’s not much to say about it and little of it is good. Bender’s Big Score might attract a new audience, but I don’t know whether I can survive the inanity of an episode of Futurama as long as that. There is a lot of demand for Butterfly Effect, but it looks to be difficult and depressing and for these reasons I have delayed watching it. John “A1Nut” Cross has given me something of a head start on The Last Mimzy, but also made me very much aware of how few answers the film offers to the many questions it raises. There are several other films here from which to choose, and at least a few about which I’ve received questions for which I do not yet have copies. So it will not be an easy choice.
But I suppose first I should see how the Star Trek analysis is received.
–M. J. Young