Shawn, I don't actually remember having said people shouldn't post on each other's game threads. Mea culpa if that's the case, but I've been running this forum game for a lot of years (Eric recently observed that he took a break from play back when his now seven-year-old was born), and so if I forgot, oops.
Graeme, it actually was because of a blow-up that happened shortly after we moved here, and because of a few tiffs that had erupted before that. One player in particular (who is currently not active) had said some rather rude things to people who posted on his thread, which I were embarrassing to me and entirely inappropriate--and I ascertained from his private statements on the matter that he did not like being bumped out of line. Another player used to joke about that, and it annoyed me then. The person who complained on this board says that his objection was not about being bumped out of line but about having the flow of his thread disrupted. I will take him at his word on that. However, at the time the board was not marking unread threads, and there had been this complaint, so I made the shift. The argument is that the point is to introduce new players to the game, so new players go first. (You're not last on the list--Ryan and Kyler are both after you, and Eric and David would also be were they to resume their games with me.)
Thus, John II is first tonight, then Shawn, then Graeme, and as always I do my own game last--which, I should emphasize, is just my system, and no one else should feel slighted if his/her referee does not do it that way.
John will have to acclimate a bit to medieval society--"cake" generally requires fine ground wheat flour, and the bread and baked goods made by peasants are made from stone ground rye flour, most commonly. He'll have to look elsewhere for cake.
One thing I learned in law school is that the argument you think weakest might well be the one that carries the case. Thus we will give Shawn persuasion checks for each individual argument, relative success against will power checks by the man in the suit, who will have a 1@8 will power as a civil authority. The first argument roll is 33; second 29; third 32; fourth 16, against a will power check of 28, which is success for Shawn.
Given Graeme's computer background (not to mention that he's an engineer, and young enough that he had to use computers to get through school), I'm going to put him down with 2@8 Computer Use T11@0 and 2@3 Computer Programming: Basic, Visual Basic, Pascal, Fortran T11@1. The first is the one that counts in this situation, with his 11@ bias doubled and his 2@3 Tech BRA, 73% chance of success. His first roll, for "Entertainer", is 67; the second, for "Engineer", 29; the third, "Magician", 44; the fourth, "Carpenter", 88. That's kind of odd, but we'll go with it.
That's good for now; I'll be back tomorrow.
--M. J. Young