Biasing out « Gaming Outpost Discussions

Gaming Outpost Discussions » Roleplaying Games

Biasing out

(21 posts) (5 voices)

Started 3 years ago by johnosevens
Latest reply from M. J. Young

Tags:

johnosevens
Member

Mostly this is a question for Scott, as I need one of his amazingly perfect and concise "I wish I had seen it before he said it" answers.

How does biasing out tech devices actually work? In fact, how does biasing out anything actually work? I get that I can't cast a Possession spell in a world with a 2@5 Mag bias, but in a 2@18 I can - I understand the concept of bias curve.

What I'm not clear on is how bias level and bias curve interact with devices. If the Tech bias is 5@3, can you turn on a computer? If I have one of those invisibility cloaks from Dancing Princess (I don't, but that would be cool) what conditions must exist in order for me to use it, and what happens if I try to use it where those conditions aren't met?

Sun Nov 23 2008 9:50 pm #
JohnA1nut
Member

what happens if I try to use it where those conditions aren't met?

This I can answer. Absolutely Nothing. No botch, no success, just nothing. If I put on the invisibility cloak and the bias doesn't support it, I'm just wearing a red cape.

Sun Nov 23 2008 10:40 pm #
M. J. Young
Moderator

The problem with giving you a concise answer is that devices work differently in different bias areas.

In the Tech bias area, generally, but not always, the listing for a skill includes the design of any device that performs that skill. Thus for example a Tech 9@8 photoelectric generator (uses photovoltaic cells to produce electrical power, too crude to use for electronic applications such as cameras) can be designed under a curve of 17 or better. Tech devices usually follow what's called the "Standard Repair Rule", which reduces the intensity of the skill by one for each step toward "simpler" on that scale. You will find it on p82 and also on p436. Following that rule, if you have or know the design of such a photovoltaic system you can build one as a T9@7 skill; you do not need the T9@8 design skill to be able to build from the design, and you can build it in any universe with a curve of at least 16. If the curve is 15, you cannot design or build such a device, but if you have one you can modify it with a T9@6 modify skill. You can repair it with a T9@5 repair skill given a curve of 14. T9@4 is the level for sabotage, the ability to break the device intelligently. (It should be noted that smashing it might or might not disable it, but sabotaging it successfully will always do so without necessarily causing it to appear damaged.) The lowest level skill is operate, which in this case is a T9@3 skill, and enables you to use the device.

Two caveats apply.

The first is that it is possible to have an @0 operate skill. If you've got a solar powered calculator, the solar array is not something you operate yourself--it works simply because you have it in the light and you activate the calculator. (We'll set aside the question of whether the calculator works for this purpose.) Things like "push this button" or "turn this knob" or "open this" are all simple @0 operation systems, requiring absolutely no understanding of how the thing works or what it does to use it. Because these are @0 operation skills, they aren't biased out; that means the power supply on the calculator works (assuming a successful roll somewhere that covers it) because you don't have to have any understanding of the system to work it. Almost any technological device can have @0 operation skill, but a lot of them--such as most weapons--do not, but require some understanding of how the device does what it does in order to use it, and thus are at least @1 skills.

The other caveat is that the standard repair rule itself does not drop any skill below @1. Hydraulics are a T7@2 skill, and given the available equipment you can design a hydraulic system under a curve of 9 and build it in any world where a 7@1 skill is possible; but you cannot sabotage it at less than a 7@1 skill because you must understand it to sabotage it, and unless it is specifically designed for idiot operation you must have 7@1 skill to operate it.

In Psi, devices all operate as 1@ skills with there intensity connected the psionic forces they control. The logic here is that a psionic device converts the simplest of psionic energy (telepathic thought) into more complex psionic energies. Because every psionic device functions in one of those categories, whatever is within the curve will work and whatever is not within the curve will not work. If a device appears to fall into two such categories (e.g., the telekinetic force field lifter of NagaWorld is both a 1@7 telekinetic and a 1@8 force generative) it always operates at the higher bias level even if the functions can be discriminated and used separately.

Mag devices are the most dangerous, because there is the double bias problem. The logic to this lies in the fact that the energy comes from outside the natural realm and so a magic device is actually doing two things: it is responding to the skill to use the device by performing the skill the device performs. Operation skills for mag devices are again all level one skills, but their intensity is based not on the power released but on the ritual required to release it. The lowest of these are foci and holy symbols, devices that are magical in the sense that they are attuned to supernatural power and can be used to channel such power more reliably; how they work does not much matter, because they do not perform specific skills but only assist in performing skills. Above that are the "always active" devices at M1@2--the intelligent sword, the oracle. Rolls are made for these to see if they are working, based on the skill of the owner/user and the bias of the world; they shut down only in flatlined worlds. The most complex are called piggyback devices, which in essence are magic devices designed to activate on the activation of some other magic device--as for example a magic belt of protection that will activate if you successfully activate a magic weapon.

This is where magic is tricky, though. When you use a mag device, you perform the skill of activating the device, and your roll against your SAL determines whether the device activates, assuming it is within the bias curve of the world. However, once you have done that, the magic device itself performs the skill that does what you wanted to do. It does not need to roll; your roll determines whether it successfully releases the magic. So let's say you have a wand of fireballs. This would be a M1@8 Instant Use Activation device--point, say the word or make the movement or whatever, and the fire comes out immediately (usually RF1). It will work under a curve of 9--except that under a curve of 9, it is not possible for magic to produce controlled fire in this world, because the creation of fire is a M9@2 skill, requiring a curve of at least 11. Thus if the curve is at least 9 but not at least 11, you have successfully released magic into the world which your device cannot control--an automatic botch. The magic will do whatever the referee decides the magic will do. It might create an uncontrolled fire; it might create a cone of cold, or a magic anomaly. It might fire flower petals to cover all the ground for a hundred yards. It might explode. It is magic without control; it can do anything at all.

Finally, bod devices really confuse people. The other name for bod devices is symbionts; they are creatures that become attached to other creatures and provide abilities to those host creatures through that attachment. Here there is a double skill check, but no automatic botch. The first skill check determines whether the symbiont connection skill is working--can the host get the symbiont to attempt what he wants. The second skill check is made by the symbiont--a creature in its own right who uses its own skills for its own purposes as well as to serve the host. It is also governed by the bias curve, and is something like a cross between an associate verser and a piece of equipment, and so it can do what it can do under the bias just as the verser can. Thus for example you might have a B4@3 Genus-Specific Natural Symbiont with a B8@6 skill at flying at traffic speeds (it would probably manifest itself as wings appearing to be attached to your back, the degree to which it is able to hide itself part of its skill set). You want to fly across the chasm in front of you. You roll your 4@3 symbiont skill to determine whether you can persuade the symbiont to carry you across the chasm by flying. If you are successful, it rolls its 8@6 fly at traffic speeds skill. If the curve is at least 7, your symbiont skill is possible; if it is not at least 14, the flight skill is not possible. Presumably that means the symbiont tries and fails to fly--but it's not a botch, because it's simply not possible.

For what it's worth in that example, most creatures with a B8@6 Fly at Traffic Speeds skill probably also have an 8@1 Slowed Descent skill, so you have a good chance that you won't fall to your death. Of course, you might have to roll your symbiont skill again to get the symbiont to use this slowed descent skill--but if the symbiont has the ability to be aware of your situation, it might decide to do that entirely on its own, particularly given that it just failed to fly.

I hope this clarifies things. I also wonder whether while I've been composing this Scott has hopped in and given a real clear simple explanation that I entirely overlooked.

--M. J. Young

Sun Nov 23 2008 11:25 pm #
johnosevens
Member

So... Tech devices can be sabotaged before they can be repaired, repaired before they can be designed, and designed before they can be used.

Psi devices either work or don't - if the skill the device is trying to do doesn't work, it doesn't matter whether your "activate device" skill works or not, the device simply can't respond.

Mag devices have their freaky auto-botch range.

And Symbionts ... which I increasingly want ... work halfway between psi and magic, in that you roll to activate, they roll to do, but there is no auto-botch.

Mon Nov 24 2008 12:40 am #
M. J. Young
Moderator

Backwards on the Psi devices: it may be possible to do by device what you cannot do directly. If the activation skill works, the device works. It is also possible that you cannot do by device what you can do directly, if the skill is within the curve but the activation skill for the device is not. I don't have a specific example of either--but give me a minute, I'm sure I can come up with one. Actually it's relatively simple.

If you have a P1@1 Operate Psionic Detection Device skill, you would be able to operate a device that performs any psionic detection (not clairvoyant) skill. That would include for example a P3@2 detect location or detect direction--a sort of psionic Garmin, I suppose. If the curve is not at least 5, you could not do those detects directly; but the device could still do them.

Let's imagine a different device, the telekinetic lifter of NagaWorld. This performs effectively a P4@3 Heavy Object TK. The skill to operate the device is a P1@7 Operate Psionic Telekinetic Device. The skill itself requires a curve of 7, but the operate device skill only works under a curve of 8 or better. Thus there will be worlds in which the skill can be done but the device will not work.

If the psi device will not work because of bias, it is inert. You can detect that it is psionically attuned (if you have skill that will do so under the biases of that world), but you cannot make it do anything. If the device will work, then it will perform the skill even if such a skill is otherwise above the bias curve.

The reasoning is that psionic devices manage mental energy differently from brains. They are almost technological in their logic, relating to molecular alignments of some sort akin to magnetism. In a low bias world it isn't that mental energy itself won't work, but that brains cannot produce the type of energy needed. As long as brains can still produce the type of telepathic energy needed to operate the device, the device can convert it into the type of energy necessary to perform the skill in the world. (A powerblock will prevent this, but powerblocks should be used judiciously--they need to be considered very carefully for their repercussions beyond their intended effects.)

There is a separate "game" logic behind it, which is that we wanted the devices of each bias area to be distinct in ways that were appropriate to their bias area. In the psi bias area, if you can't work a device it's because you can't generate the necessary energy to power it; if you can, then you can, and the device works. Similarly, if you can't perform a skill it's because you can't generate the necessary energy to perform that skill--but a device might be able to do so. If neither you nor the device will work, then the energy cannot be created in that universe; but it is more because neither method will work than because it can't be done at all.

--M. J. Young

Tue Nov 25 2008 6:05 am #
WilliamTWodium
Member

This is why in Men of Psience I was very careful to place the psi bias such that devices capable of creating other devices were not possible; if they were, the Psientists could create a device with which to create a teleportative device, and the whole arms-race angle would cease to have anything to do with the verser.

. . . that post would make a lot more sense if anyone were familiar with the scenario I was running in that world.

Tue Nov 25 2008 6:24 am #
johnosevens
Member

Machines building other machines that build more of themselves give me a headache. >.>

Tue Nov 25 2008 7:42 am #
WilliamTWodium
Member

This isn't that, though. This is more like using a hammer to make a specialized tool that you then use to build a gun.

Tue Nov 25 2008 8:00 am #
johnosevens
Member

First let me thank MJ and Scott for helping me figure out about biases and devices. At least now I know that Ric cannot turn on his laptop in a world where the Tech bias is in the mid 5@'s. He can push the button, but the machine has forgotten how to work.

OK, that said, I think I've come up with something. I'm not sure whether this is brilliant, or would unmake creation, or wouldn't work at all, so let's see...

Is it possible to use a Psi 15@10 Do Anything ability to - either actually or functionally - raise either the Psi or the Mag bias? That is, either actually raise it in a limited area, or functionally raise it ("treat this 10' circle as though the Mag bias were 15@10 for all purposes")? Even through the creation of a portable demi-universe with fully permeable (i.e. shoot-through friendly) barriers?

Tack that Alter Reality or Create Demiplane onto a psionic device.

Then bond a symbiont into your hand. Its only function is to send the signal that activates that device as a Bod ability, shaping the electrical impulse with its body in the same way that an electric eel can be electric, on a much more precise and limited scale, simulating a thought pattern using something other than actual brain matter.

Now you can create your own over-the-top bubble-universe anywhere you like, so long as the Bod bias is high enough to support our little friend (remember he's activating the psionic device as a Bod ability not as a Psi 1@).

Would this work? Or have I just gone silly? Or is this one of those things where, yes it would work, but your referee would slap you upside the head if you actually did it?
Come to think of it, if this sort of thing were possible, Adam probably would've spotted it years ago, but I figure it's worth a shot.

Wed Nov 26 2008 6:36 pm #
M. J. Young
Moderator

Hmmmm...

Well, first, it is possible to operate a computer even in a flatlined bias. The chance of success is very low, and the computer is likely to error quite a bit, but since Operate Computer is an 11@0 skill when it's entirely user friendly, the computer has a chance of turning on and doing what is asked. Programming, too, is possible, as it is an 11@1 skill. Hacking (bypass security) is not. He can use the computer, but he can't know whether the results he gets are right, and it has a high probability of crashing--shutting down abruptly without damage to itself but without saving data.

Second, there is no P15@10 Do Anything skill; there is a M15@10 Do Anything. It is the equivalent of a wish, really, but serves a secondary function: if a spell does something that does not fit under any other category no matter how broadly defined, this is the place for it.

I'm also not entirely sure that you could raise the bias with such a skill. You could probably create a skill that temporarily raises the mag bias, but since you can only do the skill (even by device) in a world with a curve of 25, the only place it's going to be useful is going to be in 0@25 worlds, where the device itself is going to be less than fully reliable. However, you can't talk in terms of bias when you craft a skill. To the player, bias is a technical term that describes structures within the game. To the character "bias" is a word used to recognize that worlds favor or oppose skills. The character knows that sometimes some skills don't work, and sometimes skills are more difficult, but he can't put bias levels or intensities on anything. "bias level" and "bias intensity" to the character don't mean more than the degree to which things are possible in a given world.

That tells me that any skill would have to be couched in terms that mean either "make the impossible possible" or "increase the chance of success".

On the latter, that's a simple 1@ blessing, and if it works in that world it will sit-mod your chance of success--but it won't change the bias, only your chance of success.

On the latter, well, we've already established that the skill will only work in a world with a 25 bias curve in magic, there is nothing in the mag bias are that won't work. Still, the point was to make it increase the bias in the tech, psi, and bod bias areas--and it won't do this, either, because of PLR. Yeah, you'll see that abbreviation from time to time. It stands for Path of Least Resistance, and it means that wishes will accomplish what is wished by the simplest means possible. The fact is, anything you can do as a tech, psi, or bod skill you can also do as a mag skill--hence the Do Anything listing. So you want to make your explosives work, and you set them despite the fact that you know that for some reason this type of explosive won't work in this world. You use your M15@10 do anything to "make the explosive work", but what you get is a magic explosion in the location of the technological explosive. The fact is, you're bringing supernatural power into the universe to make it do something, and it will do what you want done, but it will be done by supernatural power.

There is no psionic equivalent of a wish because in order to "do anything" in psionics, you have to be specific. You can of course do anything by means of psionics in a world with a curve of 25, but again, you will be accomplishing the results psionically. Bias is not controlled by psionics; it is controlled by two distinct but related factors: 1) the level of knowledge among the indigs somewhere in the universe; 2) the decision of the god or gods that rule that universe. These come to the same thing: if the gods have decreed that the bias is low, then the indigs don't know more than they can know under the bias; if the indigs have learned more than the bias allows, then the gods must have allowed the bias to rise. If you want to change the bias, you must either increase the level of knowledge broadly among the indigs, or get the gods to change the rules. Gods do not change the rules casually or for brief periods of time or location; they change them for long periods of time, usually very gradually. Even terribly chaotic gods maintain that much order in their universes.

Your psionic skill thus is going to work much as the mag skill: your fusion rifle "works" because of a psionic create energy ability. However, since psionics doesn't allow that nondescript equivalent of a wish, you will not be able to create one device that does everything.

You can probably find a way to create a subuniverse. There's actually a technological method of doing so discussed under space travel in the tech chapter. There is probably a psionic way to do it that just is not coming to mind at the moment, and I'm sure it can be done by magic. (I doubt there is a bod way to do this; bod skills tend to be limited to the self or those connected to the self.) So you could in theory create a sub-universe around yourself, and you might be able to establish the biases you want. However, very few skills will cross a sub-universe boundary at less than a -50 sit-mod penalty, so it is questionable how much benefit that would give you.

You're wrong about the symbiont. Your relationship to the symbiont is a bod skill, but its relationship to a mag or psi device would be, for it, a mag or psi skill as appropriate. You can't activate a mag or psi device as a bod skill, because the energy is what defines the nature of the skill, and therefore even if this appears to be done by physical movements (holding, staring into, shaking, twirling) those are support for the skill (ritual or technique), not the performance of the skill itself. You can't bypass the fact that to work magic you have to work magic, and to perform psionics you must perform psionics. Note, too, that psionic devices are limited in what they can do by the bias intensity at level 1. Although you could in theory make your mag device a M1@2 always active device, this would mean 1) that it would not work in any universe with a curve of 2 or less and 2) that in any world whose curve was at least 3 and not at least 25 it would be constantly botching.

I think I covered everything. Did I miss anything?

--M. J. Young

Thu Nov 27 2008 4:15 am #
WilliamTWodium
Member

(I doubt there is a bod way to do this; bod skills tend to be limited to the self or those connected to the self.)

Could a Bod skill redefine the volume occupied by one's body as a separate subuniverse? It would be classed under 15@ Non-Physicality, for lack of a better place, unless it was a B11@10 Immunity to Physical/Metaphysical Laws or some other such shenanigan.

Time in thought will reveal advantages gained by doing this, but the mechanism by which it would be accomplished is difficult to imagine.

Thu Nov 27 2008 4:58 am #
M. J. Young
Moderator

Yeah, I was thinking that if it could be done it would be one of the non-corporeality skills. Probably a 15@8 Dual World Existence would do it; but I think that even in that case, the creature would be able to use the skills of the bias of that other universe (most commonly a border supernatural) within that other universe and be treated as a visitor in this one, so he couldn't really overcome the biases of the present world except by crossing the universe boundary between the two worlds of his existence. Easy enough to work magic in the border supernatural realm, but very difficult to get that magic to pass into the natural world.

--M. J. Young

Fri Nov 28 2008 1:31 am #
WilliamTWodium
Member

Still, useful if what I want to do is shapechange or heal my own wounds or rid myself of a curse. Plus, any effect targeting me would need to cross a universe boundary to get there - a potent shield.

Unless we're envisioning different skills, which is quite possible. I'm thinking that my flesh counts as its own subuniverse; anything I do that extends beyond my flesh is crossing a subuniverse boundary. Limiting, but advantageous in several respects.

Fri Nov 28 2008 5:51 am #
johnosevens
Member

Is it possible to make a sub-universe with a characteristic that says it massively bonuses attempts to cast spells out from inside it? Like, the universe heavily favors outgoing magic? Or is that just silly?

Fri Nov 28 2008 6:32 am #
WilliamTWodium
Member

Well, sure, but once the magic leaves the universe the bonus wouldn't apply anymore, so I don't see that it would affect much of anything.

Fri Nov 28 2008 7:02 am #
Tadeusz
Member

I don't think so.

"Tall Tales of Mythica", an American Folk Tales universe, has a +100% bonus anytime you try to do something legendary which fits in with the Paul Bunyan-Pecos Bill style of the universe.

You could create a Hammer and Eggshell Universe where attack powers are massively bonused, and defense powers are correspondingly weakened. Such a universe would tend to produce 'fast draw artists'.

Fri Nov 28 2008 7:06 am #
M. J. Young
Moderator

Is it possible to make a sub-universe with a characteristic that says it massively bonuses attempts to cast spells out from inside it? Like, the universe heavily favors outgoing magic? Or is that just silly?
I think we have to be careful here: can who create such a sub-universe?

The referee can create any sub-universe he wants, as Eric observes. The question is, what purpose does it serve him?

For a character to create a sub-universe is a tremendously difficult high-bias skill in any bias area. To then define the biases of that sub-universe makes it even more difficult, more challenging.

And, what is being overlooked in this: a sub-universe is part of a universe. That means when you verse out, it does not go with you, and you will have to create it afresh in the new universe. That in turn means that the bias curve of whatever bias area you're using to create your sub-universe has to be high enough to allow you to do that in this universe.

But by that point, it would seem that the bias curve, at least, is high enough in a bias area in which you have demonstrated very high skills (the skill to create a sub-universe) that you probably have sufficient skills to work powerfully within that universe without trying to do something else. If your concern is that the curve is high but the level is low, thus giving you low probabilities of success on all your powerful skills (no bias bonus), there are easier ways to boost your chance of success than to create a sub-universe around yourself.

(From another perspective, it would also seem to be a way of saying to the referee that you don't want to play this game--that you'd rather play a game in which you can always do all your magic, or all your whatever skills, instead of one in which your abilities change as you move to a new universe. There are people who don't like Multiverser because they don't want to play in different kinds of universes or scenarios--who don't want to be in a fantasy world or a sci-fi world, who don't want to have something completely unexpected tossed at them. There are games for that. This is a game for being uncertain about what the rules of the new universe are until you've explored them for yourself.)

--M. J. Young

Sat Nov 29 2008 6:13 am #
JohnA1nut
Member

I'm curious. The biases reflect the biases of the ENTIRE UNIVERSE right? So that means that, if you're on a world with a flatline tech bias, it's flatlined on EVERY SINGLE WORLD IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE, right?

I was just thinking that could make an interesting scenario. The verser lands on a world where scissors haven't been invented yet, and thus believes that the tech bias is fairly low. However, it's actually 15@10, and the planet is invaded by Independence Day style aliens, and the verser is the only one with technology capable of defending the planet.

Tue Dec 2 2008 6:29 am #
johnosevens
Member

A1Nut - Just because the Tech bias is 15@10 doesn't mean everybody knows about it.

Besides, the Verser would know the Tech bias was high the instant all his Tech devices still worked. In a world where scissors were considered high tech, even something like a wristwatch probably wouldn't - and certainly nothing with a computer in it.

Tue Dec 2 2008 7:13 am #
JohnA1nut
Member

Besides, the Verser would know the Tech bias was high the instant all his Tech devices still worked.

Well, there's always a few things that still work for the verser regardless of the bias. My first world was high psionic. My second world was flatlined for psionics. The way I tested to see if psionics worked was by throwing TK pulses. They still work in a flatline world, but not much else does. I assumed that the world was still high psionic. I could imagine a verser not realizing that the tech bias was high, based on similar circumstances.

On a different note, wouldn't your character "feel" that psionics wasn't working as well? You go from a 15@10 psionic bias to a flatline bias. Wouldn't you "feel" that it was a lot more difficult? I could imagine an experienced verser getting to be able to tell the approximate psionic bias by how difficult his TK pulse was.

Tue Dec 2 2008 9:00 am #
M. J. Young
Moderator

Some universes are divided into subuniverses; biases can be different in subuniverses. In fact, right now Graeme is in Roma in the Triverse, a universe in which Earth itself is split into three sub-universes with distinct biases, each bounded by geopolitical boundaries and stretched by political rules (e.g., a ship sailing from Roma carries Roman biases with it as long as it is on the high seas, but if it encounters a ship from Mongolchin, the Mongolchin ship is covered by Mongolchin biases). Similarly, there is one planet in the Blake's 7 universe on which the two indigenous ghosts weild great magical power, but magic does not work at all well outside there.

But indeed, The Farmland (beta) in The Second Book of Worlds is exactly the kind of scenario you describe, in which human technology includes blacksmithing, but the aliens have interstellar travel and are intent on conquering these primitives among whom you find yourself. Just because the tech bias is high doesn't mean everyone knows it, as Harry says.

Could you "feel" that the psi bias is low? I think so--but I think that the way you would feel it is by trying to do things and discovering that they don't work so well. Also, you would have to have a high psi bias yourself, or you really couldn't tell. Let's consider you, for example. You've got a 5@ bias at the moment; you were playing with your TK pulse. Your BRA is 2@2 and your SAL is 2@2, so that's 44% in a flatlined bias. If the bias is at least 5@, you get twice your bias level as a bonus, 54%. That's not a big deal, and if all you had to go on was that you tried the TK pulse five times and two of them worked, the statistics aren't going to tell you anything. But you as a player do have more than that: if one of those five rolls was 46 and it didn't work, you know that you're looking at a 0@ bias level, because if the bias level was 1@ you would have +2 for bias and the skill would work on a roll of 46. Also, if one of those rolls was 54 and it worked, you know that the bias level is at least 5@, because if it were lower than that that roll would have been a failure.

You as a player know the roll; your character does not. Yet the player is permitted to know the rolls for his skill checks, and to make character decisions based on these, precisely because the character has that "feeling" that the player does not have. That "feeling" is apparent when your effort "should have worked" but didn't, when you did everything "right enough" that in that other world where the bias was higher it would have worked.

So maybe you're not paying attention to the rolls. Maybe you, as a player, aren't really watching the fact that this number was a success in another universe but is a failure here. Maybe you're not adding your SAL and BRA to see what the minimum chance of success is, and comparing the roll to it to determine how far from that you were when it worked and when it didn't. But then, maybe your character isn't paying attention to that "feeling", either. Your "sense" of the successes and failures by the numbers on the dice convert directly to his "sense" of the ease or difficulty with which he is accomplishing things in his world.

So, it's there.

Oh, and the only time you benefit from a world bias that is above your own is when you are learning a new skill, and then the benefit is relatively minor (not more than +/-15 against a range of a couple hundred). If all the techology you know is the stone knife, you can't really sense that technology is high even if a flying saucer lands next to you--you don't understand enough technology to know that that's what that is. In the same way, a high psi bias means very little to you if you don't have it yourself.

--M. J. Young

Wed Dec 3 2008 1:54 am #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.