Forget this was here. Mike's right. I was doubting whether or not I should post it, and decided not to.
(Doing Therapy)
Bullets
(6 posts) (3 voices)-
Glantri
MemberUsing this as a photo for your point is worthless. You can do a Google image for better and clearer scale images such as 20mm shells held in a persons hand for scale. Until a real point is made with suitable photos I don't see merit in offering other input.
Yes, I'm not answering the question. You also purposefully picked images that don't outline a point you're trying to make.
Wed Jun 2 2010 11:22 pm # -
JohnA1nut
MemberTwo
MJ, there's a store not too far from here that said they might be interested in checking out Multiverser to sell. It's a D&D store from the looks of the place. I just didn't want to start a new thread.
What happened here was I was using a picture of a, shall we say, questionable nature to illustrate a point I was making. Mike's right. It wasn't appropriate. Sorry. It's gone now, as you can see.
(Doing Therapy)
Thu Jun 3 2010 1:50 am # -
Thanks, John. At the moment we've got supply problems we're still struggling to fix, so I can't really tell him how to get copies, but we're working on it.
--M. J. Young
Thu Jun 3 2010 8:24 pm # -
JohnA1nut
MemberWell, let me know when you get it fixed.
MJ, ya know, I just read the blog. You were talking about getting in trouble for using the correct term for a female dog. The picture I intended to display was of a scantily-clad blond woman wearing a bandoleer of bullets. (Hence, the title.) Though scantily clad, she was fully dressed, and whatever else it may have been, it was a to-scale picture of the bullets. That was my entire intention. I just thought that was kind of a similar thing to your getting into trouble over using that particular word. Misunderstood intentions, or something similar.
(Doing Therapy)
Thu Jun 3 2010 8:34 pm #
Reply
You must log in to post.