It can be ordered; it will take a few days.
The one in the catalog has an electromagnetic latching and release system, so it locks both closed and open automatically, unlocking with a push of the release button in the grip.
Are there any bonuses for making a serious attempt to do a really good job? I would be trying to build a weapon of quality here. Extra effort. Making my list and checking it twice, ya know. Any bonuses for that? I've also got a bonus blacksmithing prayer to use as well.
Technically to build a quality weapon you have to be professional at building that kind of weapon, and you've never built any weapon before. That puts me in a bit of a bind, because on the one hand you've got the 2@1 blacksmithing skills to make something like this, while on the other if you classed yourself a maker of such weapons you would probably be 1@10. However, let me recap requirements for making a weapon of quality:
- Craftsman must be at least 2@ in the appropriate skills.
- Roll must be at least 51 to make a quality weapon.
- Bonused if the weapon maker is skilled in the use of the type of weapon being made.
- Bonused if the weapon maker has 3@ manufacturing skills.
- Bonused if the weapon maker has studied the combat style similar to the one in which the weapon will be used.
- Bonused if the weapon maker has studied the techniques of the person for whom it is being made.
All of those bonuses, though, go to the quality of the weapon, not to the chance of manufacturing it. It is assumed in the basic roll that you are taking your time and doing it right. Rather than bonus careful work, we penalize rushed work. This is not always the case, but is the general rule.
What you are describing appears to me to have the following characteristics:
Three lengths of pipe are required, each of which is narrower in outside diameter than the former is in inside diameter.
Four metal rings are required, plus two metal stoppers of some sort.
The first ring has an inside diameter equal to the outside diameter of the second pipe, so that the second pipe will pass through it. It is secured to the end of the first (outer) pipe, centered such that the second pipe will be perfectly centered inside the outer pipe when it passes through that ring.
The second ring has an outside diameter equal to the inside diameter of the first pipe; it is secured to the back end of the second pipe, such that it, too, holds the second pipe perfectly centered inside the first. It is the function of these two rings that when the second pipe slides down inside the first, the second ring stops when its outside hits the inside of the first ring, and thus stops the pipe from falling out.
The third ring is to the second pipe what the first ring is to the first pipe. It also prevents the second pipe from passing the first ring and so falling inside the first pipe.
The fourth ring is to the third pipe what the second ring is to the second pipe.
The stopper on the bottom of the third pipe acts much as the third ring, preventing the third pipe from falling into the second.
The stopper on the top closes the back of the object, but has no mechanical function.
There must also be an interlocking function. Probably the first ring and third ring have meshing tabs such that a counter-clockwise twist from the perspective of the handle pushes these tabs together, and the same arrangement is present between the third ring and the bottom stopper. In this way, a sharp clockwise twist (the direction that would be natural cross-drawing it with the right hand) would probably release the two. However, there is not an obvious way to get them to lock in the open position.
You could go with the toy lightsaber design, in which each of the pipes is slightly tapered. The end would need some sort of pressure release cap. In this case, a good kinetic jolt would send the interior pipes toward the far end, but since they are tapered they would stick when the space narrowed sufficiently for them to become caught on the walls of the outer pipes. It would take a sharp tap on the front end to jar them back. This design, though, would rattle, as the inside pipes are loose when retracted.
Thoughts?
--M. J. Young